|
|
First Energy Stadium has bad ring to itJanuary 18, 2013Instead of reaching a deal for naming rights to Cleveland Browns Stadium, First Energy should have taken the money and given its Northeast Ohio customers a price brea.... Showing 6 of 6 comments
Post a Comment |
|
samraree
Hay Trib: just goes to show you how much money Frist energy is making... shuting down those 6 Coal fired power plants hasn't hurt them one bit..
And here i was misinformed.. someone told me that that Wind Mill outside the stadium provided all the power that the stadium needed.. well maybe First energy could buy that too....
3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
cmkcmk1234
The Tribune calling for more regulation? It is a very, very chilly day in hell...
2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WarrenProud
Wow -the Trib agrees with me for once. This naming deal is an affront to all First Energy customers in Ohio. The PUCO needs to take action to punish First Energy with rate reductions. They obviously are making too much money from it's customers.
3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Billdog
Now the trib is indorsing regulation. I guess somehow this must effect them down in Virginia.
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
savj1c
Billdog,you nailed it.They have NEVER shown an interest in regulation.This,in some way,effects their business holdings.They also don't speak for Browns fans.Browns fans are thinking that the money made from this deal will go to get free-agents!Big name,productive ,winning free-agents.
2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Senator1218
Yes! Today ban utility spending on Stadium advertising. Tomorrow ban utility spending for ALL media advertising, including the THE PRINT MEDIA!
1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »